Minspeak
vs. Dynamic Display
Related to the selection
of a symbol system is its organization. The organization of symbols
is very important because it
establishes how a child locates a particular message, and, consequently,
affects the speed (how long it takes) and efficiency
(how many movements are required) to ouput a message. Currently among
voice output communication aids (VOCAs), there are
two predominant symbol organizational systems, Minspeak, also known
as Semantic Compaction, which is associated with the Prentke-Romich
Co. (www.prentrom.com), and Dynamic Display Pictograph technology, which
is associated with Sentient
Systems (www.sentient-sys.com). Both are symbol organizational systems
used with sophisticated voice output communication
aids (VOCAs) that allow the user to quickly locate the desired message
among all the available messages.
In simplest terms,
Minspeak uses a single overlay in which a number of picture-covered
buttons are located. By pressing a
button or combinations of buttons, the desired message is activated.
The pictures themselves are logically selected to act as
cues to remind the user of the underlying message(s). One picture can
represent more than one word or concept. For example,
a picture of an apple can represent an apple, food in general, or red
objects. If the user wants to say a certain food, then the apple
is selected to represent food, followed by at least one other button
to, then, indicate the specific food.
In contrast, dynamic
display systems are organized on a hierarchical basis, with each level
of pictures increasing in specificity. Pressing a picture-button automatically
displays only the set of pictures (i.e. categories or messages) that
are under the category
of the previous button. The first level of pictures, therefore, represent
the largest themes. Pressing one of these picture-buttons automatically
reveals the next logical set of pictures representing items in that
theme. In this manner the user navigates down
through automatically-appearing menus until the desired message is found.
For example, pressing the picture-button that
represents food may bring up a screen with pictures that represent breakfast
foods, snacks, lunch food, etc. Pressing one of
these buttons would then bring up the specific foods in that category.
Today, the differences
between Minspeak and DDP have lessened, in particular since the introduction
of a device, the
Vanguard by Prentke-Romich Co., that utilizes Minspeak in a DDP format
(P. McNairn, personal communication, March 1, 1999).
OTHER RESOURCES:
"Dynamic display pictographic AAC: Tips, tricks and techniques"
by Philip R. Lawrence at www.closingthegap.com/cgi-bin/lib/libDsply.pl?a=1008&b=3.
"Frequently
Asked Questions about Minspeak" by Robert V. Conti, B.A., Jeffrey
Micher, B.A., and Gail VanTatenhove, MS, CCC-SLP at www.lti.cs.cmu.edu/scs/faq.html.
"Semantic Compaction
in Both Static and Dynamic Environments: A New Synthesis" by Russell
Thomas Cross, B.Sc.(Hons), MRCLST, Bruce R. Baker, A.M., Linda Valot
Klotz, M.A., CCC-SLP, and Arlene Luberoff Badman, M.A., CCC-SLP at www.jsrd.or.jp/dinf_us/csun_98/csun98_064.htm.
Ask AAC users themselves
on Augmentative Communication On-Line Users Group (ACOLUG) listserv
at www.temple.edu/inst_disabilities/ ACOLUG/tacolug.html.
"Minspeak Operator
Home Pages" at the bottom of "Links" by Prentke-Romich
Co. at www.prentrom.com/links/links.html
For additional information: YAACK
Permission granted
4-28-03